Improving the implementation of KiVa antibullying program with tailored support: Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are no evidence-based models to support the implementation of school-based bullying prevention programs. Our primary objective is to examine the impact of tailored support on the implementation of the KiVa antibullying program. Our second objective is to evaluate whether the offered support influences student outcomes (e.g., victimization, bullying perpetration). We also assess the cost-effectiveness of the provided support and conduct a process evaluation. METHODS: In a cluster randomized control trial (cRCT), we compare program fidelity between schools that receive implementation support and those that do not. Twenty-four (N = 24) schools in Finland were randomized to either the IMPRES condition (receiving support, n = 12) or the control group (KiVa as usual, n = 12). In the IMPRES condition, pre-assessment and staff training were organized, and a selected team of staff members received four mentoring sessions during one academic year. Staff and students answer questionnaires at the end of school year 0, at post-intervention (year 1) and again at the 1-year follow-up (year 2). Our primary outcomes concern two main program components - universal and indicated actions - reflecting program fidelity. As secondary outcomes, we examine the level of bullying victimization and perpetration as well as students' perception of several program fidelity indicators. Finally, we assess several tertiary outcomes, collect resource data and conduct qualitative interviews to perform additional analyses. CONCLUSION: This trial will inform us of whether implementation support can boost program fidelity and have a distal impact on bullying prevalence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15558617 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15558617.

Classroom norms of bullying alter the degree to which children defend in response to their affective empathy and power.

This study examined whether the degree to which bullying is normative in the classroom would moderate associations between intra- (cognitive and affective empathy, self-efficacy beliefs) and interpersonal (popularity) factors and defending behavior. Participants were 6,708 third- to fifth-grade children (49% boys; Mage = 11 years) from 383 classrooms. Multilevel modeling analyses revealed that children were more likely to defend in response to their affective empathy in classrooms with high levels of bullying. In addition, popular students were more likely to support victims in classrooms where bullying was associated with social costs. These findings highlight the importance of considering interactions among individual and contextual influences when trying to understand which factors facilitate versus inhibit children's inclinations to defend others.

The architecture of high status among Finnish youth.

We tested the construct validity of a two-dimensional model of high status, consisting of social acceptance and perceived popularity (hereafter, acceptance and popularity) among Finnish children and adolescents. In addition, we investigated the correlates of the two forms of high status, as well as their relations to resource control. Participants were 563 boys and girls in grades four and eight, that is, aged 10-11 and 14-15. CFA and SEM models supported the hypothesis of acceptance and popularity representing distinct, yet associated constructs that have partly different correlates. Acceptance and popularity were most closely connected among grade four students, particularly among boys. Prosocial behaviour was associated with acceptance, whereas peer-valued characteristics (physical attractiveness, athletic ability) and aggression were related especially to popularity. Popularity, but not acceptance, was positively related to resource control.